No new grants at present – SCOTUSblog
Amy Howe Unbiased Contractor and Reporter
Posted Mon, April 15th, 2019 10:08 am
Posted Mon, April 15th, 2019 10:08 am by Amy Howe
Earlier than returning to the bench this morning, the justices issued orders from final week’s non-public convention. They didn’t add any new circumstances to their deserves docket for subsequent time period, and so they requested the U.S. solicitor common to weigh in on an enchantment filed by Arkansas lawyer common Leslie Rutledge. Rutledge has requested overview of a ruling by the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the eighth Circuit, which held that an Arkansas legislation regulating prescription-drug reimbursement practices is pre-empted by the federal Worker Retirement Revenue Safety Act of 1974.
The justices didn’t act on a number of of the high-profile circumstances that they thought of eventually week’s convention, together with a problem to an Indiana legislation that banned abortion primarily based on (amongst different issues) the intercourse or incapacity of the fetus and required fetal stays to be buried or cremated; a gaggle of circumstances asking the justices to weigh in on whether or not federal employment discrimination legal guidelines shield LGBTQ staff; and a petition for overview filed by an Oregon couple who refused to make a customized cake for a same-sex wedding ceremony.
The justices will meet for his or her subsequent convention on Thursday, April 18; orders from that convention are probably subsequent Monday, April 22, at 9:30 a.m.
This submit was initially revealed at Howe on the Court docket.
Posted in Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Administration Affiliation, Featured, What’s Occurring Now
Really helpful Quotation:
No new grants at present,
SCOTUSblog (Apr. 15, 2019, 10:08 AM),