Monday round-up – SCOTUSblog

Monday round-up – SCOTUSblog

Posted Mon, August 12th, 2019 7:10 am by Edith Roberts

For the Washington Examiner, Melissa Quinn stories that “[t]he U.S. Supreme Court docket will begin its subsequent time period after a summer time punctuated by mass shootings that left greater than two dozen lifeless, heightening the influence of pending instances that target when civilians can carry weapons in public.” Robert Barnes stories for The Washington Submit that the courtroom “should determine whether or not to press forward with a Second Modification case it has accepted for the approaching time period, its first in a decade,” after “town and state of New York … have basically surrendered, altering the restrictions at situation despite the fact that town efficiently defended them earlier than a district choose and a federal appeals courtroom.”
At CNN, Catherine Valentine stories that “[t]he Justice Division has requested the Supreme Court docket to assessment and reverse what it describes firmly as a ‘misunderstanding of the regulation’” in a lower-court ruling “ five-year statute of limitations [on rape charges against members of the military] existed earlier than 2006.”

At The Economist’s Democracy in America weblog, Steven Mazie appears to be like at three instances the courtroom will close to this fall that ask whether or not federal regulation protects workers from discrimination on the idea of sexual orientation or gender identification, noting that though “[e]xpanding homosexual rights by way of an outdated statute may seem to be a stretch for a Supreme Court docket with a five-justice conservative majority that now lacks Justice Anthony Kennedy, who authored 4 landmark opinions vindicating the rights of homosexual and lesbian folks,” “probably the most promising arguments operating by 4 dozen briefs from the plaintiffs and their supporters don’t attempt to push the justices towards any significantly radical concepts.”
In The New York Evaluation of Books, David Cole opinions two books concerning the Supreme Court docket – “a fastidiously argued and disturbing portrait of how partisan politics threaten to engulf the Court docket” by Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum, and Joan Biskupic’s biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, “without delay a dedicated Republican with very conservative coverage preferences and ties to the conservative group, and an institutionalist who cares deeply concerning the nonpartisan character of the Court docket.”
We rely on our readers to ship us hyperlinks for our round-up. If in case you have or know of a latest (revealed within the final two or three days) article, publish, podcast or op-ed referring to the Supreme Court docket that you simply’d like us to think about for inclusion within the round-up, please ship it to roundup [at] Thanks!
Posted in Spherical-up
Really useful Quotation:
Edith Roberts,
Monday round-up,
SCOTUSblog (Aug. 12, 2019, 7:10 AM),

Monday round-up


Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *