Court docket releases January calendar – SCOTUSblog
Posted Fri, November eighth, 2019 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court docket launched the calendar for the January sitting, which begins on January 13, 2020. The justices will hear eight hours of oral argument over 5 days; they won’t sit on Monday, January 20, which is a federal vacation. On two of the 5 days – January 15 and 22 – the justices will hear just one case.
The highlights of the sitting embrace the January 14 oral argument in Kelly v. United States, through which the justices will weigh in on the federal convictions that resulted from “Bridgegate” – the September 2013 change within the visitors patterns on the George Washington Bridge that created gridlock in close by Fort Lee, New Jersey. Prosecutors say that officers working for then-Governor Chris Christie and the Port Authority made the change to punish town’s mayor for not endorsing Christie’s reelection bid. The query earlier than the justices is whether or not a public official defrauds the federal government of its property when she gives a “public coverage motive” for an official choice that’s not her precise motive for making the choice.
And on January 22, the justices will hear oral argument in Espinoza v. Montana Division of Income, a dispute over a Montana regulation that created tax credit to offer scholarships for households who ship their kids to non-public colleges, together with spiritual colleges. The Montana Supreme Court docket struck the regulation down, ruling that it violated the state’s structure as a result of it helped spiritual establishments. Three low-income moms who used the scholarships to ship their kids to a Christian faculty in Kalispell, Montana, went to the Supreme Court docket, arguing that excluding spiritual colleges from the scholarship program violates the federal Structure.
Right here is the total record of circumstances to be argued in January, together with a brief abstract of the problems in every:
Fortunate Model Dungarees v. Marcel Style Group (Jan. 13): Whether or not, when a plaintiff asserts new claims, federal preclusion ideas can bar a defendant from elevating defenses that weren’t really litigated and resolved in any prior case between the events.
Thole v. U.S. Financial institution (Jan. 13): Whether or not a participant in a pension plan can convey a lawsuit in opposition to the managers of the fund when the participant has not but suffered any particular person monetary damage.
Kelly v. United States (Jan. 14)
Romag Fasteners v. Fossil Inc. (Jan. 14): Whether or not a exhibiting of willfulness is required to get well a trademark infringer’s income.
Babb v. Wilkie (Jan. 15): Whether or not federal staff alleging age discrimination should present that the opposed employment choice wouldn’t have occurred had been it not for his or her age.
Shular v. United States (Jan. 21): Whether or not the dedication of a “severe drug offense” below the Armed Profession Felony Act requires the identical categorical method used within the dedication of a “violent felony” below the act.
GE Vitality Energy Conversion France v. Outokumpu Stainless USA (Jan. 21): Whether or not, below the Conference on the Recognition and Enforcement of Overseas Arbitral Awards, somebody who was not a signatory to an arbitration settlement can nonetheless compel arbitration primarily based on the doctrine of equitable estoppel.
Espinoza v. Montana Division of Income (Jan. 22)
This publish was initially printed at Howe on the Court docket.
Posted in Thole v. U.S. Financial institution, N.A., Fortunate Model Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Style Group Inc., GE Vitality Energy Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC, Espinoza v. Montana Division of Income, Romag Fasteners Inc. v. Fossil Inc., Kelly v. U.S., Shular v. U.S., Babb v. Wilkie, Featured, What’s Occurring Now
Court docket releases January calendar,
SCOTUSblog (Nov. eight, 2019, 2:33 PM),